Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
MC No. 29/2025

Case between State vs Babu K. P. et al regarding violation of bail conditions

Court
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-II
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan B.
Order Date
2025-12-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the State as the petitioner and Babu K. P. and Nijeesh as the counter petitioners regarding the sureties for an accused in a previous case. The accused failed to appear in court, leading to penalties for the counter petitioners.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The counter petitioners are directed to pay a penalty for the accused's failure to appear in court as required. Failure to pay will result in further action including simple imprisonment.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Penalty of Rs.5,000/- each
Case Type
MC
Final Judgment
No
The counter petitioners are directed to pay a penalty for the accused's failure to appear in court as required. Failure to pay will result in further action including simple imprisonment.
Key Reasoning:
The counter petitioners failed to appear before the court despite being served notices, justifying the penalty.
Why Defendant Won:
The counter petitioners failed to appear before the court despite being served notices, justifying the penalty.
Supporting Evidence
There is no justifiable cause or reason as to why the accused was not present or why the counter petitioners were not able to produce him.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1) The counter petitioners are directed to pay penalty of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) each under section 491 BNSS.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Babu K. P.
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nijeesh
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The counter petitioners are directed to pay penalty of Rs.5,000/- each under section 491 BNSS.
Evidence:
Thus, the counter petitioners/sureties are directed to pay Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) towards penalty and the rest is remitted.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Issue Distress Warrant to collect the amount under section 461 (1)(b) of BNSS.
Evidence:
Issue Distress Warrant to collect the amount under section 461 (1)(b) of BNSS, if the penalty is not paid within one month.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Counter petitioners liable to undergo simple imprisonment for 10 days in Civil Prison if penalty is not paid.
Evidence:
If the warrant could not be executed, the counter petitioners are liable to undergo simple imprisonment for 10 days in Civil Prison.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
MC
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between State vs Babu K. P. et al regarding violation of bail conditions
Case Code Year
Case between State vs Babu K. P. et al regarding violation of bail conditions

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
10 days

Quick Facts

Location
NADAPURAM
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between State vs Rashid V. V. et al regarding bail violation
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-II, NADAPURAM
MC Plaintiff Won
Case between State vs Babu K. P. et al regarding violation of bail conditions
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-II, NADAPURAM
MC Plaintiff Won
Case between State vs Sukhilesh et al regarding bail conditions and penalties.
Court of Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-II, Nadapuram
MC Defendant Won
Case between State of Kerala vs Arifa regarding closed MC
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS-II
MC Unknown
Case between State of Kerala vs Santhosh, Nidhin regarding penalty payment
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, NADAPURAM
MC Plaintiff Won