Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
MC No. 36/2025

Case between State vs Rashid V. V. et al regarding bail violation

Court
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-II, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan B.
Order Date
2025-12-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the State as the petitioner and Rashid V. V. and Souda K. V. as counter petitioners regarding the violation of bail conditions. The counter petitioners, who are sureties, failed to ensure the appearance of the accused in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The counter petitioners were directed to pay a penalty of Rs. 5,000/- each for their failure to ensure the accused's appearance in court. A distress warrant will be issued if the penalty is not paid within one month.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Penalty of Rs. 5,000/-
Case Type
MC
Final Judgment
No
The counter petitioners were directed to pay a penalty of Rs. 5,000/- each for their failure to ensure the accused's appearance in court. A distress warrant will be issued if the penalty is not paid within one month.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The counter petitioners failed to appear in court despite being duly notified.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The counter petitioners failed to appear in court despite being duly notified.
Supporting Evidence
Considering the facts and circumstances, I am of the view that a reasonable amount can be ordered to be paid as penalty.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1) The counter petitioners are directed to pay penalty of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) each under section 491 BNSS.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rashid V. V.
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Souda K. V.
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The counter petitioners are directed to pay penalty of Rs.5,000/- each under section 491 BNSS.
Evidence:
the counter petitioners are directed to pay penalty of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) each under section 491 BNSS.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Issue Distress Warrant to collect the amount under section 461 (1)(b) of BNSS.
Evidence:
Issue Distress Warrant to collect the amount under section 461 (1)(b) of BNSS, if the penalty is not paid within one month.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Counter petitioners are liable to undergo simple imprisonment for 10 days in Civil Prison if the warrant could not be executed.
Evidence:
if the warrant could not be executed, the counter petitioners are liable to undergo simple imprisonment for 10 days in Civil Prison.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
MC
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between State vs Rashid V. V. et al regarding bail violation
Case Code Year
Case between State vs Rashid V. V. et al regarding bail violation

Case Flags

Imprisonment Involved
Imprisonment Duration
10 days

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between State vs Babu K. P. et al regarding violation of bail conditions
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-II
MC Defendant Won
Case between State vs Babu K. P. et al regarding violation of bail conditions
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF THE FIRST CLASS-II, NADAPURAM
MC Plaintiff Won
Case between State vs Sukhilesh et al regarding bail conditions and penalties.
Court of Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-II, Nadapuram
MC Defendant Won
Case between State of Kerala vs Arifa regarding closed MC
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS-II
MC Unknown
Case between State of Kerala vs Santhosh, Nidhin regarding penalty payment
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, NADAPURAM
MC Plaintiff Won