Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 129/2022

Case between STATE OF KERALA vs ASOKAN et al regarding compensation for damages

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-06-19
Duration
approximately-3 years 4 months
Case Closed
Thu, 06/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, State of Kerala, represented by the Director General of Police, seeks compensation for damages to a vehicle allegedly caused by the defendants during an incident at the residence of Asokan. The defendants deny the allegations, claiming they were not present during the incident.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff seeking compensation from the defendants for damages to a police vehicle. The court found insufficient evidence linking the defendants to the alleged damages.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff seeking compensation from the defendants for damages to a police vehicle. The court found insufficient evidence linking the defendants to the alleged damages.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to prove the involvement of the defendants in causing the damage to the vehicle.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to prove the involvement of the defendants in causing the damage to the vehicle.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence given by PW1 is insufficient to establish the said fact.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
STATE OF KERALA
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
ASOKAN
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SUMESH. K. P
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SHOJIN
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Babil. M. T
Party Age
23
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
NIJEESH
Party Age
23
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of FIR No. 42/2021 of Kuttiadi Police Station, Certified copy of vehicle damage certificate issued by Assistant Motor Vehicle Inspector, SRT Office, Perambra.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C. Prasad
Appearance Type
Government Pleader
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Vijayan Kannoth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V. G. Niran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Compensation for damages caused by the defendants amounting to Rs 4,500/-.
Evidence:
In the present case the plaintiff was not able to prove the fact that which defendant caused damage to the department vehicle.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of FIR
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the police report regarding the alleged incident.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified copy of vehicle damage certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document providing an assessment of damages caused to the vehicle.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing communication from the DGP to the District Police Chief.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Certified copy of Scene Mahazar
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document detailing the scene of the incident as recorded by the police.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Certified copy of Body Mahazar
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document recording the state of the situation during the incident.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certified copy of Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document summarizing important details related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certified copy of final report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document summarizing the conclusion of the police investigation.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Compensation and Damages
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between STATE OF KERALA vs ASOKAN et al regarding compensation for damages
Case Code Year
Case between STATE OF KERALA vs ASOKAN et al regarding compensation for damages

Case Flags

Arrest Involved

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 02/15/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 06/19/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA et al vs SANDEEPAN regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between UNNIKKORACHAM VEETTIL ABDULLA vs THE KERALA WATER AUTHORITY et al regarding injunction restraining trespass.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between CHANDRAN vs SECRETARY et al regarding petition dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between N. K. Chandran vs SECRETARY, NADAPURAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH regarding suit dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Dhanya.K, Shaji, Aswin vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding compensation for negligence leading to death.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won