Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. No:81/2017

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd vs Saithalavi regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Court
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-07-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd filed a complaint against Saithalavi for an offense under the Negotiable Instrument Act. The complainant later sought to withdraw the complaint, which was granted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court acquitted the accused by allowing the complainant to withdraw the complaint. The accused's bail bond was canceled and he was set at liberty.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court acquitted the accused by allowing the complainant to withdraw the complaint. The accused's bail bond was canceled and he was set at liberty.
Key Reasoning:
The complaint was withdrawn by the complainant, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Why Defendant Won:
The complaint was withdrawn by the complainant, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complainant and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complainant.

Judgment Evidence:

In this result, the accused is acquitted. Under section 257 Cr. P.C. His bail bond stands canceled and he is set at liberty.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saithalavi
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jithesh. K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.P Jayakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint.
Evidence:
the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complainant.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Accused is acquitted under section 257 Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
the accused is acquitted. Under section 257 Cr. P.C.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd vs Saithalavi regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act
Case Code Year
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd vs Saithalavi regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd vs Haneefa. M regarding offence under N.I. Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Criminal Case Defendant Won
Case between Abdu Rahman vs Ajeesh regarding U/s. 138 of N.I. Act
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II, TIRUR
Criminal Case Unknown
Case between Abdu Rahman vs Ajeesh regarding offense under U/s. 138 of N.I. Act
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II, TIRUR
Criminal Case Unknown
Case between Shaijal Babu vs Abdul Razak. T.K regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act
Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case Unknown
Case between Mohammed Rafi vs Mohammed Shereef regarding U/s 138 of N.I. Act
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won