Case Summary
The plaintiff, Smt. Abitha Rajesh, is seeking to recover an amount from the defendant, Mohammed Jinesh, related to transactions concerning CCTV products. The defendant failed to represent himself in court, leading to a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 1,51,234/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's case was proven through uncontested evidence.
The plaintiff's case was proven through uncontested evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 1,51,234/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Smt. Abitha Rajesh (39 years years)
61/245 A, Zeia Arcade, Church Landing Road, Pallimukku, Kochi, PIN - 682 016
Smt.Reshma U (35 years years)
61/245 A, Zeia Arcade, Church Landing Road, Pallimukku, Kochi, PIN- 682 016
Defendants
Mohammed Jinesh (Age not specified years)
XIX/83, Royal Plaza, Bridge Road, Aluva, Aluva West Village, Ernakulam (Dist), PIN - 683 101
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay the plaintiff an amount of Rs. 1,51,234 with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 1,51,234/-(Rupees one lakhs fifty one thousand two hundred and thirty four only) with interest at the rate of 12% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the authority of the finance manager to represent the plaintiff in the case.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Cheque
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This cheque was part of the transactions between the plaintiff and defendant, indicating payment due.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This memo indicates that the cheque was returned, further supporting the plaintiff's claim for recovery.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice is a formal demand for the payment amount due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt serves as proof of the communication sent to the defendant regarding the payment.
Reference:
Ext.A6