R.C.P. No. 38/2022

Case between Sindhu. S vs Laila Pareed regarding non-prosecution of rent control petition.

Court

COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER

Judge

Smt. REEJA R. NAIR

Order Date

2026-01-06

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Sindhu. S, filed a petition against the respondent, Laila Pareed, under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioner and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner.

Key Reasoning:
The court found that the petitioner was not interested in proceeding with the case as there was no representation and proof affidavit filed.

Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the petitioner was not interested in proceeding with the case as there was no representation and proof affidavit filed.

Supporting Evidence

the court is of view that the petitioner is not interested to proceed further.

Judgment Evidence:

Thus the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sindhu. S
Party Age: 43
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Laila Pareed
Party Age: 49
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: S. Renjith
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: K.R. Prathish
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K.A. Mohammed Salih
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.

Evidence:

Thus the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification