Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 197/2024

Case between Siju K S vs Sajitha Sabu regarding realization of money from the defendant based on the sale agreement.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
approximately-1 year 10 days
Case Code No.
197
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Siju K S, entered into a sale agreement with the defendant, Sajitha Sabu, for purchasing property. The case involves a breach of contract as the defendant failed to execute the sale deed after receiving an advance payment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, entitling him to recovery of the advance amount and interest from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize ₹4,77,660/- along with interest and costs of the suit from the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, entitling him to recovery of the advance amount and interest from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved that the defendant breached the contract by not performing as agreed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved that the defendant breached the contract by not performing as agreed.
Supporting Evidence
Ext.A1 and oral evidence of PW1 would show that defendant had not performed her part of contract. She was not ready to return the received sale consideration also.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1The plaintiff is entitled to realize ₹4,77,660/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Seventy Seven Thousand Six Hundred and Sixty only) as on the date of suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Siju K S
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajitha Sabu
Party Age
27
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Ext.A1 original sale agreement executed between plaintiff and defendant on 08.11.2023.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abraham Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize ₹4,77,660/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1The plaintiff is entitled to realize ₹4,77,660/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Seventy Seven Thousand Six Hundred and Sixty only) as on the date of suit.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to get interest at the rate 9% per annum on ₹4,50,000/- from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Evidence:
He is also entitled to get interest at the rate 9% per annum on ₹4,50,000/- from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original sale agreement executed between plaintiff and defendant on 08.11.2023.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Breach of Contract
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally, Kottayam District, Kerala, India
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Wed, 11/08/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Abraham Mathew et al vs Suresh Raman et al regarding suit dismissal
Court of the Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Dhanya S., Silamban M. et al regarding non-payment of court fee.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Joseph Antony et al vs C. M. M Educational and Charitable Trust regarding Interlocutory Application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayat regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won