Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 06/2020

Case between Sidhique vs P.G.Thankamma et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-09-08
Duration
Case Code No.
06
Case Closed
Mon, 09/08/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Sidhique, aged 73, filed a suit against the defendants including P.G.Thankamma and others. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff was not ready for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was unprepared to present evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was unprepared to present evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not ready for evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was not ready for evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff not ready for evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sidhique
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.G.Thankamma
Party Age
75
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shanavaskhan Sidhique
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jawaharlal Memorial Social Welfare and Public Corporation Centre
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jawaharlal Memorial Social Welfare and Public Corporation Centre
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.S.Vishnu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Vaikom Taluk, Kottayam District, Kerala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 09/08/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Geetha et al vs Prabhakaran regarding lawful agreement.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Lillykutty Tomy vs K.G. Venugopal regarding suit dismissal.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.N. Manoharan et al vs Deena Panicker et al regarding suit for permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shaji et al vs Renjith Monai et al regarding a compromise petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Devaraj vs Sajimon regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won