Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 387/2022

Case between Shijad C.B vs Muneer K.M regarding realization of money

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-25
Duration
approximately-3 years 21 days
Case Closed
Mon, 03/25/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Shijad C.B, claims that the defendant, Muneer K.M, owes him Rs. 1,20,000 for fabrication work performed. The defendant contends that he has settled all dues and that the cheques given were merely security.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the defendant, determining that no amount was due to the plaintiff and dismissed the suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the defendant, determining that no amount was due to the plaintiff and dismissed the suit.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that no cause of action arose as the cheques were not presented for encashment.
Why Defendant Won:
The court determined that no cause of action arose as the cheques were not presented for encashment.
Supporting Evidence
It cannot be said that the cause of action for the suit has arisen. Ext.B1 would amply prove that there was sufficient fund in the account during the contract period.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shijad C.B
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muneer K.M
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque bearing No. 054881 dated 05.04.21, Cheque bearing No. 054882 dated 25.03.21, Copy of lawyer notice, Postal receipt
Defendants Documents
Transaction details bearing Account no. 5556053000029526

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Antony Shiju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N.S.Muhammed Usaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.Priyadevi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of Rs. 1,20,000/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
The suit is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque bearing no. 054881 issued by the defendant as a security for payment.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque bearing no. 054882 issued by the defendant as a security for payment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendant for the payment of the due amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt for the issuance of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Transaction Details
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Transaction details bearing Account number 5556053000029526 to prove sufficient funds was available.
Reference:
Ext.B1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Shijad C.B vs Muneer K.M regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Shijad C.B vs Muneer K.M regarding realization of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 03/02/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 03/25/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s Maya Printers vs Sandhya Anil regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s PromoteN vs Basheer regarding money recovery
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Foryes Associates vs M/s. Home Centre et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Smt. Andal vs H Venkatesha Naik Jewellary et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s Eleonore regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won