Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 747/2024

Case between Smt. Andal vs H Venkatesha Naik Jewellary et al regarding realization of money.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-02-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Smt. Andal, invested in a gold scheme offered by the defendants but did not receive the agreed amount upon maturity. The plaintiff claims financial loss and seeks the monetary equivalent of the gold due.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing her to recover the invested amount along with specified interest. The defendants failed to provide any evidence in defense of their claim.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,18,792.88/- and interest at specified rates.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing her to recover the invested amount along with specified interest. The defendants failed to provide any evidence in defense of their claim.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrebutted evidence from the plaintiff established her claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unrebutted evidence from the plaintiff established her claims.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A3 established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1. The Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,18,792.88/- ...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Smt. Andal
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
H Venkatesha Naik Jewellary
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ravinath Mohandas
Party Age
60
Plaintiffs Documents
Original of certificate dated 30.07.2019, Copy of Lawyer's Notice dated 06.07.2024
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dinesh Rao A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. Manu Raj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Hari Sharma M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,18,792.88 from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: The Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,18,792.88/- (Rupees Four lakhs Eighteen Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety Two and Eight Eight Paisa) from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till date of decree.
Evidence:
The Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.4,18,792.88/- from the date of suit till date decree from the defendant.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest at 6% per annum from date of decree till date of realization.
Evidence:
The Plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.4,18,792.88/- from date of decree till date of realization from the defendants.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original certificate issued by the defendants confirming the deposit of gold.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A copy of the notice issued to the first defendant regarding the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A copy of the notice issued to the second defendant regarding the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Smt. Andal vs H Venkatesha Naik Jewellary et al regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Smt. Andal vs H Venkatesha Naik Jewellary et al regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 07/12/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s Conpac Mix Pvt. Ltd. vs Faizal regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Maya Printers vs Sandhya Anil regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s PromoteN vs Basheer regarding money recovery
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Foryes Associates vs M/s. Home Centre et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s Eleonore regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won