Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 28/2024

Case between Shibu Lawrance vs Vinod Kumar regarding rent control

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
approximately-2 years 4 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shibu Lawrance filed a rent control petition against Vinod Kumar regarding rent arrears and possession of a residential building. The parties entered into a mediation agreement to settle the matter.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the rent control petition under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act based on the mediation agreement terms, directing the respondent to pay the rent arrears and granting vacant possession if terms are not complied with.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rent arrears remittance and vacant possession if not complied.
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the rent control petition under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act based on the mediation agreement terms, directing the respondent to pay the rent arrears and granting vacant possession if terms are not complied with.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement were lawful and accepted by both parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation agreement were lawful and accepted by both parties.
Supporting Evidence
The court is convinced that the parties have entered into the agreement voluntarily and the mediation agreement is accepted.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the rent control petition is allowed under section 11(2)(b) of the Act as follows: 1. The respondents are hereby directed to remit the rent arrears as per terms in mediation agreement by 19.05.2025, failing which the respondent is hereby directed to put the landlord in vacant possession of the petition schedule building.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shibu Lawrance
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aji K.M
Party Age
46
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinod Kumar
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Memorandum of Agreement dated 19.05.2025.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajesh & Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Baby Thomas Mariamma Joseph, T.J. Aiswaryraj, Johny George, Indrajith S. Kaimal, Alicia Jose & Alberthoue Francis M.G.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to remit the rent arrears as per the terms of the mediation agreement.
Evidence:
The respondents are hereby directed to remit the rent arrears as per terms in mediation agreement by 19.05.2025.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in vacant possession of the petition schedule building if the term is not complied with.
Evidence:
Failing which the respondent is hereby directed to put the landlord in vacant possession of the petition schedule building.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the mediation agreement dated 19.05.2025 that contained the terms agreed upon by both parties.
Reference:
Document Type: Mediation Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court reviewed the mediation report along with the Memorandum of Agreement.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shibu Lawrance vs Vinod Kumar regarding rent control
Case Code Year
Case between Shibu Lawrance vs Vinod Kumar regarding rent control

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Greeshma vs Shaija Saji regarding rent control
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Mr. Thomas Jose Pallan vs Ms. Megha M.B. regarding Rent Control
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between V.G.Divakaran vs T.G.Mohanan regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Bose John vs SNA Oushadhasala Pvt. Ltd et al regarding eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Mathew Ninan et al vs Sujith P.S. et al regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won