Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 267/2022

Case between Shamon K.S. vs Jose Dominic et al regarding non-payment of court fee.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration
Case Code No.
267
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Shamon K.S., filed a suit against the defendants, including Jose Dominic and others, concerning the non-payment of court fee. The court ultimately rejected the suit due to this non-payment.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was rejected as the balance court fee was not paid, and no costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected as the balance court fee was not paid, and no costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

The court on the same day delivered the following: JUDGMENT Both parties are represented. Balance court fee is not paid. Suit is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shamon K.S.
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jose Dominic
Party Age
78
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheri K. Jose
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fredy K. Jose
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mary K. Jose
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mathew Jose
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bilu G.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Muhammed Haris K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sabitha G.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Suit is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Suit is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Abraham Mathew et al vs Suresh Raman et al regarding suit dismissal
Court of the Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Dhanya S., Silamban M. et al regarding non-payment of court fee.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Joseph Antony et al vs C. M. M Educational and Charitable Trust regarding Interlocutory Application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayat regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won