Case Summary
The petitioner, Shamla P.B. and Muhammed Asif, seek eviction of the respondent, Muhammed Muneer, for failing to vacate the rented premises and for non-payment of rent. The case involves a lease agreement for a residential building that was violated by the respondent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from the petition scheduled building.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner sufficiently proved the violation of the rent agreement and the non-payment of rent.
The petitioner sufficiently proved the violation of the rent agreement and the non-payment of rent.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result the petition is allowed with costs as follows. The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Shamla P.B. (40 years)
Kannathupadikkal House, Moolepadam Nagar, Kalamassery P.O., Pin-683 104
Muhammed Asif (Age not specified years)
Defendants
Muhammed Muneer (48 years)
Fizas Manzil, G-2 Rock Garden, Vazhakkala, Now residing at H.No.VI/269 A2, Moolepadam Nagar, Kalamassery P.O., Pin-683104
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioner sought eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
the petitioner is entitled to get an order of eviction as she prayed for.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is a lawyer notice sent by the petitioner demanding the arrears of rent and for the respondent to vacate the petition schedule building.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is proof of the dispatch of the Ext.A1 lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Returned Cover
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the lawyer notice (Ext.A1) was returned unserved.
Reference:
Ext.A3