Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
S.T. No:199/2017

Case between Shaijal Babu vs Sidhique regarding offence under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act

Court
JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE -II
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-07-18
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a complaint filed by Shaijal Babu against Sidhique for allegedly committing an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The case revolves around a cheque issued by the accused, which was returned due to insufficient funds.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found the accused not guilty of the offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and acquitted him. The complainant failed to prove the transaction and issuance of the cheque.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The complainant did not succeed in proving the debt or liability for which the cheque was issued.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, accused is acquitted under S. 255 (1) Criminal Procedure Code for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Shaijal Babu (Age not specified years) Kottampara House, Edayoor North P.O, Valanchery, Malappuram

Defendants

Sidhique (Age not specified years) Tippu Samudram Kaniyar Veetil House, Muthur, Tirur. P.O, Malappuram

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque allegedly issued by the accused towards repayment of a loan.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Memo issued by the bank indicating that the cheque was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.P2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the statutory notice sent to the accused regarding the dishonour of the cheque.
Reference:
Ext.P3
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of delivery of the statutory notice to the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reply from the accused denying the liability.
Reference:
Ext.P5
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Account statement used to substantiate the financial transaction.
Reference:
Ext.P6
Document Type: Passport
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Passport used to prove that the accused was not in India at the time the cheque was allegedly issued.
Reference:
Exbt.B1

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases