Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 880/2020

Case between Shaheer vs K.M.Basheer et al regarding restoration of suit

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-04-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shaheer, the plaintiff, filed a petition to restore a suit dismissed for default due to non-appearance. The defendants, K.M.Basheer and Shaila, contested the petition claiming the plaintiff's actions were meant to pressure them into a settlement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition to restore the suit was allowed on the condition that the plaintiff pays ₹3,000 to the respondents as compensation for the inconvenience caused. Failure to pay will result in the petition being dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of the suit on condition of payment of costs.
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition to restore the suit was allowed on the condition that the plaintiff pays ₹3,000 to the respondents as compensation for the inconvenience caused. Failure to pay will result in the petition being dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court took a liberal view due to the circumstances surrounding the non-appearance of the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court took a liberal view due to the circumstances surrounding the non-appearance of the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
However considering the fact that the said occurred not due to a mistake on the part of the petitioner and for the fact that the petitioner should not be punished for a mistake not of his own, this court is inclined to take a liberal view.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed on condition of payment of cost of ₹3,000/- to the respondents.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shaheer
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.M.Basheer
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shaila
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.V.Vibin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.S.Sajeev Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bismi T.A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restoration of the suit on condition of payment of costs.
Evidence:
the petition is allowed on condition of payment of cost of 3,000/- to the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shaheer vs K.M.Basheer et al regarding restoration of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Shaheer vs K.M.Basheer et al regarding restoration of suit

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Latha Murali vs Subaida P et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank Of India vs M/s Network Academy regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vasudevan Pillai vs Muhammed Haneeffa C et al regarding restoration of a dismissed petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Johny Thomas vs Shiju alias Thampi regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Elsy James vs P.C Jose regarding restoration of original suit.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won