Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. 0.181/2024

Case between Union Bank Of India vs M/s Network Academy regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-08-05
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Union Bank of India is the plaintiff seeking to realize money from M/s Network Academy. The defendants petitioned to set aside an ex-parte decree passed against them.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition to set aside the ex-parte decree, stating the defendants had sufficient cause for not appearing in the original suit. The case is restored to file for merits.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient cause for the defendant's absence, allowing the opportunity to contest the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

1) Petition is allowed. Exparte decree dated 22.01.2025 is set aside. Suit is restored to file.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Union Bank Of India (Age not specified years) Vytilla Branch, 26/621, Jain Tower, N H Byepass, Vyttila, Ernakulam - 682 019

Defendants

M/s Network Academy (Age not specified years) 55/3499, David S Colony, Behind Navy Quarters, Chilavannoor Road, Elamkulam, Kadavanthra P O, Ernakulam, Pin: 682 020 Sidhik Ibrahim (46 years years) Bushra Manzil, Thevanpara Road, Thiruvananthapuram, Pin - 695 541

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Exparte decree dated 22.01.2025 is set aside and the suit is restored.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the above petition is liable to be allowed in the interest of justice. So the exparte decree dated 22.01.2025 is liable to be set aside.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases