Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 0.181/2024

Case between Union Bank Of India vs M/s Network Academy regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-08-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Union Bank of India is the plaintiff seeking to realize money from M/s Network Academy. The defendants petitioned to set aside an ex-parte decree passed against them.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition to set aside the ex-parte decree, stating the defendants had sufficient cause for not appearing in the original suit. The case is restored to file for merits.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition to set aside the ex-parte decree, stating the defendants had sufficient cause for not appearing in the original suit. The case is restored to file for merits.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient cause for the defendant's absence, allowing the opportunity to contest the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found sufficient cause for the defendant's absence, allowing the opportunity to contest the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that defendant has made out sufficient cause for not appearing before the court to contest the suit and participate in the trial.

Judgment Evidence:

1) Petition is allowed. Exparte decree dated 22.01.2025 is set aside. Suit is restored to file.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Union Bank Of India
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Network Academy
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sidhik Ibrahim
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Vakalath dated 10-06-2024

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N Raghunath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jinu Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vino Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adarsh Dharmajan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Exparte decree dated 22.01.2025 is set aside and the suit is restored.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the above petition is liable to be allowed in the interest of justice. So the exparte decree dated 22.01.2025 is liable to be set aside.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Union Bank Of India vs M/s Network Academy regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank Of India vs M/s Network Academy regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank Of India vs Mr. Dileep Kumar T N regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between IDBI Bank limited vs Kudumbasree Div 9 NHG 37 Suhrtham et al regarding restoration of a dismissed suit.
IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Shreejith P Shaji, Shaji P regarding Loan Recovery
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between ICICI Bank Ltd vs Najmal Mustafa regarding restoration of a suit
IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s Eleonore regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won