Case Summary
IDBI Bank Limited filed a petition to restore a suit that was previously dismissed. However, the petitioner was absent and there was no representation from the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for default as the petitioner was absent and no representation was made by them. The petition was filed to restore a suit dismissed on 16.09.2023.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- IDBI Bank limited
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kudumbasree Div 9 NHG 37 Suhrtham
- Relation
- represented By
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thittethil Yesudas Mary
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rakhi V P
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sharanya
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thankamani P K
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Paulochan Antony P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between IDBI Bank limited vs Kudumbasree Div 9 NHG 37 Suhrtham et al regarding restoration of a dismissed suit.
Case Code Year
Case between IDBI Bank limited vs Kudumbasree Div 9 NHG 37 Suhrtham et al regarding restoration of a dismissed suit.