Case Summary
Latha Murali filed a restoration petition seeking to set aside a dismissal order due to her absence. The court found that the matter had become infructuous and dismissed the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petition was dismissed because the matter was found to be infructuous.
The petition was dismissed because the matter was found to be infructuous.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Latha Murali (57 years)
Flat No. 120. Skyline 24 Karat-Jade, Puthukkalavattom Rd, Elamakkara, Kaloor, Ernakulam, Kerala – 682 026
Defendants
Subaida P (62 years)
8/865, Busthan House, Elambilad Desom, Kozhukkallur Village, Koyilandi Taluk, Iringath P O, Kozhikode District – 673 523
Febin Hashim (43 years)
35/1586A, Design Difference, Kaloor Desom, Poonithura Village, Kanayanoor Taluk, Palarivattom P O, Ernakulam District – 682 025
Fymin Puliyenchalil (39 years)
4/256, Thambu, Kaipamangalam Desom, Kodungallur Taluk, Thrissur District – 680 681
Fasmin Puliyenchalil (35 years)
8/865, Busthan House, Elambilad Desom, Kozhukkallur Village, Koyilandi Taluk, Iringath P O, Kozhikode District – 673 523
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition to set the dismissal aside and receive back the file on records.
Evidence:
Memo seen filed by the counsel for the plaintiff as to not proceeding with the petition further as the matter has become infructuous. Hence, petition is dismissed.