Case Summary
Latha Murali filed a restoration petition seeking to set aside a dismissal order due to her absence. The court found that the matter had become infructuous and dismissed the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the restoration petition.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was dismissed because the matter was found to be infructuous.
The petition was dismissed because the matter was found to be infructuous.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The matter has become infructuous.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Latha Murali
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subaida P
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Febin Hashim
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fymin Puliyenchalil
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fasmin Puliyenchalil
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Girijavallabhavan P M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K Shaj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition to set the dismissal aside and receive back the file on records.
Evidence:
Memo seen filed by the counsel for the plaintiff as to not proceeding with the petition further as the matter has become infructuous. Hence, petition is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Latha Murali vs Subaida P et al regarding Restoration Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Latha Murali vs Subaida P et al regarding Restoration Petition