Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 572/2024

Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Thahira Basheer et al regarding Suit for realisation of money

Court
Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-11-10
Duration
approximately-3 years 11 months
Case Closed
Mon, 11/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Self Employers Service Society, which sanctioned a loan to Thahira Basheer, with other defendants as sureties. The defendants defaulted in repayment of the loan, leading to this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding amount.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 90,314/- with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding amount.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was not rebutted by the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was not rebutted by the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 90,314/- (Rupees ninety thousand three hundred and fourteen only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum for the principal amount of 60,000/- (Rupees sixty thousand only) from the date of decree till its realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Self Employers Service Society
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thahira Basheer
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bennykumar A.S
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayaprakash K P
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shihab O I
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
True Extract of the minutes of the meeting, Authorization Letter, Loan Application, Demand Promissory Note
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Manu J Varappally
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Simeon Abraham Kurian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Hyma Baby
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Jack Augustine
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants were ordered to pay the outstanding amount due to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 90,314/- (Rupees ninety thousand three hundred and fourteen only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover costs from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: True extract of the minutes of the meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Referenced to establish the plaintiff's claims and organizational structure.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Authorization letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to validate the authority of the representative of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: The true extract of the minutes of the meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cited to support the claims regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Authorization letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further establishes authority of the plaintiff's representative.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Bye law of the society
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided context regarding the operation and governance of the plaintiff society.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Photocopy of registration certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the legal status of the plaintiff society.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Letter issued by District Registrar, Kottayam
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the authenticity of the plaintiff's documentation.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the application for the loan made by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The basis of the monetary claim against the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Formal agreement that stipulates the loan terms.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Consent letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the agreement by defendants regarding loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Copy of Lawyers Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice served to defendants demanding repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of dispatch of notice to defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: A/d Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of receipt of notice.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Computer print out of original data of accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details outstanding amount due from defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A15

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Thahira Basheer et al regarding Suit for realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Thahira Basheer et al regarding Suit for realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Thu, 12/02/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 11/10/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s Srambickal Finance vs Muhammed Ajiladh et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajeev S. Nair vs Gopalakrishnan C.V regarding realization of money.
THE MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/S Mathew and sons Finance vs Sreenivasan Nair K.S et al regarding recovery of loan amount.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd vs Sam Lukose et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Susamma et al regarding realization of money.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won