OS.513/2021

Case between Savithri Antherjanam vs Pankajakshan et al regarding compliance under Order 39 Rule 3

Court

COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF-II

Judge

Sri.C.Ubaidulla

Order Date

2021-12-03

Duration

Case Code No.

513

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Savithri Antherjanam is the petitioner and plaintiff in a case against Pankajakshan and others. The case involves a petition regarding compliance with civil procedure rules.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The court vacated a previous order regarding compliance due to a lack of adherence to procedural requirements by the petitioner.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court vacated a previous order regarding compliance due to a lack of adherence to procedural requirements by the petitioner.

Key Reasoning:
The petitioner did not comply with the necessary procedural rules.

Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner did not comply with the necessary procedural rules.

Supporting Evidence

The petitioner has not complied under order 39 Rule 3.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence order dated 17-11-2021 is vacated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Savithri Antherjanam
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Pankajakshan
Party Age: 36
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Vinod Kumar
Party Age: 38
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Hariharan
Party Age: 28
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Padmanaba Kurup
Party Age: 57
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sudheesh
Party Age: 28
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.Muhammed Arif K P
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.Muraleedharan Chalath
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.Saseendran.K.N
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Set Aside

Description:

The previous order dated 17-11-2021 was vacated.

Evidence:

Hence order dated 17-11-2021 is vacated.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Title deed

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

The title deed of the plaint was mentioned but not sent to respondents.

Reference:

Case Classification