OS. 44/2018

Case between C.M.Sreemathy et al vs Raman @ Ramachandran et al regarding RP IA 152/2024

Court

THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE

Judge

Smt.Meera John K

Order Date

2025-10-03

Duration

Case Code No.

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

C.M.Sreemathy and others petitioned against Raman @ Ramachandran and others in relation to a legal matter. The case involved multiple parties and was presented for hearing before the court.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The petition was heard, and the court allowed the application. Costs were paid by both parties.

Why Plaintiff Won:
Both parties were represented and costs were settled.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Both parties were represented and costs were settled.

Supporting Evidence

Both parties represented. Costs paid.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, IA allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: C.M.Sreemathy
Relation: Died

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Geetha.V.T
Party Age: 78
Relation: W/o.V.T.Sreenivasan

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Beena Naveen Kumar
Party Age: 68
Relation: W/o.Naveen Kumar

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: C.M.Jeevan
Party Age: 65
Relation: S/o. C.M.Raghavan

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: C.M.Sharmilla
Party Age: 63
Relation: W/o. Hareendranath

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Raman @ Ramachandran
Party Age: 51
Relation: S/o. Kumaran

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: N.M.Asokan
Party Age: 68
Relation: S/o. Moothoran

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: A.Sunil Kumar
Party Age: 52
Relation: S/o. Balan

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.K.B.Sivaramakrishnan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.K.P.Gangadharan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

IA allowed.

Evidence: