Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. 68/2021

Case between Colonel Raveendrababu vs K.P. Anek regarding restoration of suit.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.Meera John K
Order Date
2025-12-17
Duration
Case Code No.
68
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Colonel Raveendrababu filed a petition to restore a suit that he could not attend due to Ayurveda treatment. The respondent opposed the petition, claiming it was a delaying tactic.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decided to allow the petition to restore the suit but required the petitioner to pay costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of the suit on payment of cost of ₹5,000.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decided to allow the petition to restore the suit but required the petitioner to pay costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition is allowed based on the possibility of the petitioner contesting his case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition is allowed based on the possibility of the petitioner contesting his case.
Supporting Evidence
I find that a chance could be given to the petitioner to contest his case.

Judgment Evidence:

Considering the same, I am of the view that this petition can be allowed on payment of cost of 5,000 to the opposite side on or before 01.01.2026 failing which the petition stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Colonel Raveendrababu
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.P. Anek
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. E.V. Viswambharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.B. Sivaramakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition to restore the suit to file
Evidence:
I find that a chance could be given to the petitioner to contest his case.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between C.M.Sreemathy et al vs Raman @ Ramachandran et al regarding RP IA 152/2024
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.V. Basheer vs Adv. K.M. Musthafa regarding restoration of suit.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M/S U.B. Hardwares regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kalarikandy Subash Babu (died), Durga Devi, Bindya, Sandya vs Kasthuri Bai, Ramani Bai regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Moideen.V.P vs Pathumma et al regarding setting aside a final decree
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Civil Suit Defendant Won