Case Summary
Saraswathyamma is the plaintiff alleging that a sale deed is forged, while Manoj K.B. is the defendant. The case involves the validity of the signature and thumb impression on the disputed document.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petitions IA 09/2025 and IA 11/2025 filed by the plaintiff were dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff's petitions aimed to prolong the case and lacked credible justification.
The court found that the plaintiff's petitions aimed to prolong the case and lacked credible justification.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The intention of the petitioner is only to protract the matter. The attempt of petitioner is to prolong the case indefinitely.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, IA 09/2025 and IA 11/2025 are dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saraswathyamma
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manoj K.B.
Plaintiffs Documents
O.S 115/2021 documents produced as evidence.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.R. Anilkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- D. Muraleedhar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Petitioner filed petitions IA 09/2025 and IA 11/2025 to take specimen signatures and send a document to FSL for comparing signatures.
Evidence:
Hence these petitions are liable to be dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The petitioner alleges that the sale deed No.3103/13 is a forged document and disputes the signature and thumb impression.
Reference:
null
Document Type:
Photo Copy of Disputed Document
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photo copy of this document is filed along with O.S 115/2021.
Reference:
null
Document Type:
Document Filed in Court
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The original of the disputed document was filed before the court on 14.08.2024.
Reference:
null
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Evidence was taken in O.S 119/2021 and PW1/ petitioner herein was examined on 14.08.2024.
Reference:
null
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2021