Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No.01/2024

Case between Saramma vs Santhosh C. Kurian regarding eviction.

Court
THE RENT CONTROLLER/MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-08-16
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Saramma, the landlord, filed a petition against Santhosh C. Kurian, the tenant, seeking eviction. The landlord claims the tenant has failed to pay rent and that the property is needed for a dependent.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that the petitioner has a genuine need for the property for a dependent. The tenant was directed to vacate the premises.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the tenant
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court determined that the landlord's need for the property was genuine and bonafide.

Judgment Evidence:

Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to an order directing the respondent tenant to hand over vacant possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Saramma (59 years) Kaniyamkudiyil House, St. Peters Road, Perumbavoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam District Indiramma C G (62 years) Changottil (Kizhakkumparambil) House, Marad Kavala, Perumbavoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Santhosh C. Kurian (50 years) Chalil House, Kompazha Kara, Panancheri Village, Thrissur Taluk, Thrissur District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The petitioner has succeeded in establishing that the need to occupy the premises is natural, real, sincere, and honest.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Empowers Indiramma to look after the property and perform acts on behalf of the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of the Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Initial rent agreement for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Subsequent rent agreement related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of the Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Alleged renewed rent deed indicating rent enhancement.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of notice sent to respondent
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice indicating requirement for payment of arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Office copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Formal document demanding payment of arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending notice to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: A/d Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of notice receipt by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Reply to lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Respondent's reply challenging claims of arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further rent agreement related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Additional rent agreement for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Proof of rental payment sent via postal money order.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Another proof of rental payment sent via postal money order.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Reply given by the SHO to the application under Right to Information Act
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Information related to complaints against the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Copy of the Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Additional rent agreement related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Testimonies heard from various witnesses including the power of attorney holder.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases