Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 172/2023

Case between Sarala A.N vs Jeena et al regarding a suit decreed in terms of compromise.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-07-29
Duration
Case Code No.
172
Case Closed
Tue, 07/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiff Sarala A.N and defendants Jeena and others. It pertains to a settlement reached after mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in terms of the compromise reached between the parties. The compromise agreement was deemed lawful and will be part of the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in terms of the compromise reached between the parties. The compromise agreement was deemed lawful and will be part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Mediation report filed. Compromise petition also filed along with mediation report. Terms of agreement appears to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit decreed in terms of compromise. Compromise agreement shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sarala A.N
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o Late Krishnankutty M.P.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jeena
Party Age
47
Relation
D/o Late Krishnankutty M.P.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rakhi
Party Age
33
Relation
W/o Late Jibu M.K.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Niranjana M.J.
Party Age
8
Relation
D/o Late Jibu M.K.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Muhammed Ajeesh P.B.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thomas Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sandeep V.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Biju T.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Hence suit decreed in terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Case Closed
Tue, 07/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Geetha et al vs Prabhakaran regarding lawful agreement.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Lillykutty Tomy vs K.G. Venugopal regarding suit dismissal.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between K.N. Manoharan et al vs Deena Panicker et al regarding suit for permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shaji et al vs Renjith Monai et al regarding a compromise petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Devaraj vs Sajimon regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won