Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 25/2020

Case between Salam et al vs George M.U. regarding Rent Control

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Salam and others, are landlords who filed a rent control petition against the tenant, George M.U. The petition was filed under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The rent control petition was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioners. The court accepted the memo filed by the petitioner's counsel.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The rent control petition was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioners. The court accepted the memo filed by the petitioner's counsel.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was not pressed.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was not pressed.
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel for petitioner submits rent control petition is not pressed.

Judgment Evidence:

Both sides represented. The learned counsel for petitioner submits rent control petition is not pressed. Memo accepted. Rent control petition dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Salam
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saly
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sakeer
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sameer
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. George M.U.
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent Control Petition
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joby Jacob Pulickekudy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anil George
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ancy T.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Fathima Sulfath N.B.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dajish John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.G. Cleetus
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Rent control petition dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Memo accepted. Rent control petition dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Salam et al vs George M.U. regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Salam et al vs George M.U. regarding Rent Control

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Thykoodam Edavaka Cristeeya Sangam vs Anta Builders and Developers Private Limited regarding Rent Control
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Suresh P., Subhadra Thampuran vs Zachariah Thomas T. regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Antony Jain M.C. vs Mini Baby regarding Rent Control
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between V.K. Raveendran vs Soumya Shyam regarding Rent Control
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between V.K. Raveendran vs Soumya Shyam regarding Rent Control
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Plaintiff Won