Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 25/2020

Case between Salam et al vs George M.U. regarding Rent Control

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-06-18
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Salam and others, are landlords who filed a rent control petition against the tenant, George M.U. The petition was filed under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The rent control petition was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioners. The court accepted the memo filed by the petitioner's counsel.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petition was not pressed.

Judgment Evidence:

Both sides represented. The learned counsel for petitioner submits rent control petition is not pressed. Memo accepted. Rent control petition dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Salam (54 years) Poovathummottil House, Edappally P.O., Toll Gate, Ernakulam-682024 Saly (50 years) Poovathummottil House, Edappally P.O., Toll Gate, Ernakulam-682024 Sakeer (46 years) Poovathummottil House. Edappally P.O., Toll Gate, Ernakulam-682024 Sameer (41 years) Poovathummottil House Edappally P.O., Toll Gate, Ernakulam-682024

Defendants

Mr. George M.U. (61 years) Malamel House, Door No. XXXIll/745 [Kalamassery Municipality] 'Kadavil Mansion', Edappally P.O., Toll junction, Ernakulam-682024

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Rent control petition dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Memo accepted. Rent control petition dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases