Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1433/2019

Case between Sajeevan vs Rajeevan regarding partition and mesne profits

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-06-10
Duration
approximately-6 years 21 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff and defendant are brothers who are joint owners of a property. The plaintiff seeks partition of the property and a share of profits from the property, claiming the defendant is not willing to divide the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court partly decreed the suit and passed a preliminary decree of partition, entitling the plaintiff to a half share in the property. The defendant is also entitled to his half share.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree of partition of the property into two equal shares
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the property is partible and both parties are joint owners as per the settlement deed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is partly decreed and a preliminary decree of partition is passed as given under: 1) Plaintiff is entitled for 1/2 share in plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sajeevan (48 years) Elanjikkaparambil, Pallipram Karayil, Vazhakala Village

Defendants

Rajeevan (54 years) Elanjikkaparambil, Pallipram Karayil, Vazhakala Village

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's request for partition of property and claim for share.
Evidence:
The court is satisfied that plaint schedule property is partible and plaintiff is entitled to get 1/2 share in plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought a prohibitory injunction against the defendant.
Evidence:
Therefore the court is satisfied that plaintiff is not entitled for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction as sought for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy shows joint ownership of plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates tax payment related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the death of the father of plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Complaint filed by plaintiff against defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt for complaint submitted at Thrikkakara Police Station.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Reports condition of property and identifies income sources.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 06/10/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases