Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 53/2025

Case between Sajeev A. Joy vs Jain M.S. regarding Rent and Eviction

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-11-26
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sajeev A. Joy, the petitioner, filed a petition seeking eviction of the respondent, Jain M.S., due to non-payment of rent. The respondent defaulted on multiple rent payments and continued to occupy the premises despite receiving notices to vacate.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing the eviction of the respondent due to non-payment of rent. The respondent must vacate the premises within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from the premises within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Application
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved the non-payment of rent and the bona fide need for the premises.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed u/S. 11(2)(b) and 11 (3) of the Act with costs as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sajeev A. Joy (61 years) Areekkal House, Aikkaranadu South Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Kolenchery P.O., Ernakulam -682311

Defendants

Jain M.S. (55 years) Menachery House, Thottakkattu Kara, Aluva Taluk, Aluva, Ernakulam - 683 103

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/S. 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original sale deed No. 456/1996 of SRO, Thrikkakara.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Building Tax Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Building tax receipts (5 in Nos) in support of the case.
Reference:
Ext.A2 series
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer's notice dated 24.08.2024 along with original postal receipt and proof of acknowledgment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer's notice dated 18.10.2024 along with original postal receipt and proof of acknowledgment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Plaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaint in OS No. 1169/2024 filed by the respondent against the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Statement of accounts of the petitioner from 10.11.2021 till 10.11.2025 from Federal Bank.
Reference:
Ext.X1 series
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Statement of accounts of the petitioner from 10.11.2021 till 09.11.2025 from HDFC Bank.
Reference:
Ext.X2 series

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases