Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 53/2025

Case between Sajeev A. Joy vs Jain M.S. regarding Rent and Eviction

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-11-26
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sajeev A. Joy, the petitioner, filed a petition seeking eviction of the respondent, Jain M.S., due to non-payment of rent. The respondent defaulted on multiple rent payments and continued to occupy the premises despite receiving notices to vacate.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing the eviction of the respondent due to non-payment of rent. The respondent must vacate the premises within 30 days.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from the premises within 30 days.
Case Type
Rent Control Application
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing the eviction of the respondent due to non-payment of rent. The respondent must vacate the premises within 30 days.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved the non-payment of rent and the bona fide need for the premises.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner proved the non-payment of rent and the bona fide need for the premises.
Supporting Evidence
The uncorroborated evidence of PW1 and Exts.A1 to A5 and Ext. X1 and Ext. X2 proves the case of PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed u/S. 11(2)(b) and 11 (3) of the Act with costs as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajeev A. Joy
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jain M.S.
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Sale deed No. 456/1996 of SRO, Thrikkakkara, Building Tax Receipt (5 Nos.), Copy of Lawyer's Notice dated 24.08.2024, Copy of Lawyer's Notice dated 18.10.2024, Plaint in OS No. 1169/2024.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joji George Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Denny Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lijo Raju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the landlord in possession of the petition schedule building within 30 days.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/S. 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original sale deed No. 456/1996 of SRO, Thrikkakara.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Building Tax Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Building tax receipts (5 in Nos) in support of the case.
Reference:
Ext.A2 series
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer's notice dated 24.08.2024 along with original postal receipt and proof of acknowledgment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer's notice dated 18.10.2024 along with original postal receipt and proof of acknowledgment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Plaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaint in OS No. 1169/2024 filed by the respondent against the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Statement of accounts of the petitioner from 10.11.2021 till 10.11.2025 from Federal Bank.
Reference:
Ext.X1 series
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Statement of accounts of the petitioner from 10.11.2021 till 09.11.2025 from HDFC Bank.
Reference:
Ext.X2 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Application
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sajeev A. Joy vs Jain M.S. regarding Rent and Eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Sajeev A. Joy vs Jain M.S. regarding Rent and Eviction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Tessy Joseph et al vs Selvaraj regarding non-payment of rent
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Application Plaintiff Won
Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mrs. Reshmi Madhanan vs Mr. Kodiyath Baby Joju regarding Petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 Plaintiff Won
Case between Geetha A.Menon vs Joy et al regarding Lease and Rent Control Act petition
THIRD ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Lease and Rent Control Act Plaintiff Won
Case between Rita J. Chirayath vs Binny P. P. regarding Petition under Section 11(2) (b) & 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Petition under Section 11(2) (b) & 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 Plaintiff Won