Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No.56/2022

Case between Geetha A.Menon vs Joy et al regarding Lease and Rent Control Act petition

Court
THIRD ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-02-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner Geetha A.Menon, aged 47, seeks possession of a commercial building leased to respondent Joy for watch repair business. Respondent sublet the premises unlawfully. Judgment grants possession to petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Petitioner Geetha A.Menon granted possession of leased building due to respondent's breach of lease agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Lease and Rent Control Act
Final Judgment
No
Petitioner Geetha A.Menon granted possession of leased building due to respondent's breach of lease agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
null

Judgment Evidence:

null

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Geetha A.Menon
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joy
Party Age
74
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Philomina Joy
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Wilson Cherian
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bincy
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jeemol
Party Age
50
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Lawyer's notice, Original Postal receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Baiju Noel M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner to get possession of the petition schedule building
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/S 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner entitled to costs of the petition from the respondent
Evidence:
The petitioner is entitled to get the costs of the petition from the respondent

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Lawyer's notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notified respondent of sublease termination
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of notice delivery to respondent
Reference:
Ext.A2 Series
Document Type: Printout showing receipts of notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Printing of receipts from India Post
Reference:
Null

Case Classification

Case Type
Lease and Rent Control Act
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Geetha A.Menon vs Joy et al regarding Lease and Rent Control Act petition
Case Code Year
Case between Geetha A.Menon vs Joy et al regarding Lease and Rent Control Act petition

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Church of South India Trust Association et al vs Dinesh V. Pai et al regarding eviction petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
THIRD ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Petition under Section 11(2)(b) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 Defendant Won
Case between Hameed et al vs Shamsudheen et al regarding Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Mrs. Reshmi Madhanan vs Mr. Kodiyath Baby Joju regarding Petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 Plaintiff Won
Case between Rita J. Chirayath vs Binny P. P. regarding Petition under Section 11(2) (b) & 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Petition under Section 11(2) (b) & 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 Plaintiff Won