Case Summary
Sajeev Chandran filed a suit against Bindu.R and others for an injunction. The case involved various parties related to the property in Kollam.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the interim application for return of the plaint.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found merit in the plaintiff's plea for an injunction.
The court found merit in the plaintiff's plea for an injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found merit in the plaintiff's plea for an injunction.
The court found merit in the plaintiff's plea for an injunction.
Supporting Evidence
The court found merit in the plaintiff's plea for an injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
IA 4/23 allowed (VSO). Plaint returned to be prescribed to the court in which the suit should have been instituted.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sajeev Chandran
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bindu.R
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vaishnav. S.
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vignesh.S.
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.Sajeendra Babu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- G.Udayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- S.Sreekumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- B. Shahana
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court allowed the interim application IA 4/23.
Evidence:
IA 4/23 allowed (VSO).
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023