Case Summary
The plaintiff, Haridasan Potti, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants, Vedikkunnu Balaganapathi Kshethram. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and did not provide any evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to provide evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Haridasan Potti
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vedikkunnu Balaganapathi Kshethram
- Relation
- represented by President Aneesh
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vedikkunnu Balaganapathi Kshethram
- Relation
- represented by Secretary Achu
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Biju.P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.Vraj Mohan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kundara Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Prasanth.R.S.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff requested an injunction which was not granted as the suit was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023