Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 145/2019

Case between Sudharma et al vs Saraswathy et al regarding Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
approximately-6 years
Case Code No.
145
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Sudharma and Saraswathy @ Maniyamma, filed a suit for Injunction against the defendants, Saraswathy, Syam, and Ani @ Shibin. The court accepted the mediation report and decreed the suit in terms of the mediation agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed based on the mediation agreement signed by both parties. The terms and conditions of the mediation agreement were found lawful.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed based on the mediation agreement signed by both parties. The terms and conditions of the mediation agreement were found lawful.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs succeeded because the mediation report was accepted and found lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs succeeded because the mediation report was accepted and found lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Both parties signed in the mediation agreement and its terms and conditions are found lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence mediation report accepted. Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement and the Memorandum of agreement shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sudharma
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saraswathy @ Maniyamma
Party Age
58
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saraswathy
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Syam
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ani @ Shibin
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv.s.V.L.Baby & Ambujambal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Benoy Bal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Hence mediation report accepted. Suit decreed in terms of mediation agreement and the Memorandum of agreement shall form part of the decree.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Ajithakumari.S. vs State Bank of India et al regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Dismissed
Case between Haridasan Potti vs Vedikkunnu Balaganapathi Kshethram regarding Injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Remya Raj vs Anupama regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Pious George et al vs Salavudeen et al regarding Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Joseph.S et al vs Manohar Yesudas et al regarding Injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won