Case Summary
The petitioner, Saidalavi, was absent and not represented in the court proceedings against the respondent, Abdul Nasar. The court dismissed the application due to the failure to produce necessary documents.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restor.Ptn
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the application due to the petitioner's absence and failure to produce necessary documents.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Hence IA. stands dismissed IA.1741/2018- Batta not seen produced so far Petitioner absent. not represented.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saidalavi
- Party Age
- 1
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Nasar
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Purushothaman EM
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restor.Ptn
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Saidalavi vs Abdul Nasar regarding Restor.Ptn 1742/2018
Case Code Year
Case between Saidalavi vs Abdul Nasar regarding Restor.Ptn 1742/2018