Case Summary
The case involves Mridula as the petitioner and Devaki as the respondent. The petition was about the non-appearance of the petitions, which the court found satisfactory.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Costs of Rs. 2000/-
Case Type
Restor.Ptn
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed due to satisfactory reasons for the non-appearance. The court ordered payment of costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The reasons stated in the petition and the documents produced are satisfactory.
The reasons stated in the petition and the documents produced are satisfactory.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The reasons stated in the petition and the documents produced are satisfactory.
The reasons stated in the petition and the documents produced are satisfactory.
Supporting Evidence
The reasons stated in the petition and the documents produced are satisfactory for the non appearance of the petitions.
Judgment Evidence:
IA.101/2019 is allowed. I am satisfied that the the reasons stated in the petition and the documents produced are satisfactory for the non appearance of the petitions. Hence petition stands allowed on payment of Costs of Rs. 2000/- for payment of costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mridula
- Party Age
- 55
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Devaki
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition stands allowed on payment of costs.
Evidence:
IA.101/2019 is allowed . I am satisfied that the the reasons stated in the petition and the documents produced are satisfactory for the non appearance of the petitions.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restor.Ptn
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mridula vs Devaki regarding Restor.Ptn 1198/2018
Case Code Year
Case between Mridula vs Devaki regarding Restor.Ptn 1198/2018