Case Summary
The plaintiff, S. Srinivasan, is seeking recovery of money from the defendants, H. Venkateshan Naik Jewellery and Ravinath Mohandas, due to failure to return promised gold or its equivalent value after an investment in a gold scheme. The court found in favor of the plaintiff after the defendants did not appear.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Directing the defendants to pay ₹6,60,436 with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay an amount of ₹6,60,436 with interest. The defendants failed to appear in court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents satisfactorily proved the plaint claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 6,60,436/- ₹ (Rupees Six Lakhs Sixty Thousand and Four Hundred and Thirty Six only) with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- S. Srinivasan
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- H. Venkateshan Naik Jewellery
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ravinath Mohandas
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- Father’s name not known to the plaintiff
Plaintiffs Documents
Certificate issued by the defendants to the plaintiff, Copy of the lawyer notice issued to the 1st defendant, Copy of the lawyer notice issued to the 2nd defendant.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- A.Dinesh Rao
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K Manu Raj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of Rs. 6,60,436 with interest.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 6,60,436/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Sixty Thousand and Four Hundred and Thirty Six only) with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Certificate
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate issued by the defendants to the plaintiff acknowledging receipt of gold.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the lawyer notice issued to the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the lawyer notice issued to the 2nd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between S. Srinivasan vs H. Venkateshan Naik Jewellery, Ravinath Mohandas regarding recovery of money.
Case Code Year
Case between S. Srinivasan vs H. Venkateshan Naik Jewellery, Ravinath Mohandas regarding recovery of money.