Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 994 /2023

Case between S M Dileepkumar vs Rijun N regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration
approximately-2 years 11 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, S M Dileepkumar, is the owner of a building who filed a suit against Rijun N for non-payment of a license fee. The defendant has defaulted on payments totaling Rs.3,20,000 and is currently in jail, which has resulted in the plaintiff seeking eviction and damages.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.3,20,000 along with interest for the overdue license fees and also awarded damages for continued occupancy without payment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs.3,20,000 along with interest and Rs.80,000 as monthly damages until vacated.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.3,20,000 along with interest for the overdue license fees and also awarded damages for continued occupancy without payment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established ownership and the defendant's failure to pay license fees as per the agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established ownership and the defendant's failure to pay license fees as per the agreement.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.3,20,000/- from defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendant shall pay Rs.3,20,000/- (Rupees Three lakhs twenty thousand only) along with interest ...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S M Dileepkumar
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rijun N
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
License agreement dated 05.04.2023, Property tax receipt dated 10.09.2024, Lawyer notice dated 28.09.2023, Postal receipt dated 28.09.2023.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P Chandrasekhar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anand Sankar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant shall pay Rs.3,20,000/- along with interest.
Evidence:
Defendant shall pay Rs.3,20,000/- (Rupees Three lakhs twenty thousand only) along with interest @18% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and @ 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant shall pay Rs.80,000/- as monthly damages until vacating the premises.
Evidence:
Defendant shall pay Rs.80,000/-(Rupees Eighty thousand only) as monthly damages from the date of suit till the defendant vacates the plaint schedule premises.
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to vacate the plaint schedule premises.
Evidence:
Defendant is directed by a mandatory injunction to vacate the plaint schedule premises and give vacant possession thereof to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: License Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the arrangement between the parties for the use of the premises.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the plaintiff’s obligation to pay property tax.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the demand for payment of arrears and termination of the license agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the sending of the lawyer notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between S M Dileepkumar vs Rijun N regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between S M Dileepkumar vs Rijun N regarding realization of money

Case Flags

Imprisonment Involved
Arrest Involved

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 04/05/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s Maya Printers vs Sandhya Anil regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s PromoteN vs Basheer regarding money recovery
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Foryes Associates vs M/s. Home Centre et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Smt. Andal vs H Venkatesha Naik Jewellary et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s Eleonore regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won