Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 601 /20 23

Case between Rixon Sebastian vs Preetha Chandran regarding Restoration Petition

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M
Order Date
2025-03-04
Duration
approximately-2 years

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rixon Sebastian filed a restoration petition for his original suit which was dismissed for nonpayment of court fees. The court found the petition not maintainable and subsequently dismissed it.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the restoration petition as not maintainable.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petition for restoration was found to be not maintainable as the original suit was rejected for nonpayment of court fees.

Judgment Evidence:

Thus, this petition for restoration is found to be not maintainable and hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Rixon Sebastian (39 years years) 6/312A, Thenkulam, Mekkad P O, Nedumbassery, Ernakulam – 683 589

Defendants

Preetha Chandran (41 years years) 27/869 (50/549), LIF 788, Panampilly Nagar, Elamkulam, Ernakulam

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Petition for restoration of the suit rejected due to non-maintainability.
Evidence:
Thus, this petition for restoration is found to be not maintainable and hence dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 03/04/2023 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases