Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Reshma Ravi and Raiga Ravi, are seeking partition of the property jointly owned following their father’s death. Defendants include Manoharan K.K, Thankappan K.K, and Shine K.K, who dispute some claims regarding the ownership and partition of the property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit allowing partition of the plaint schedule property, establishing the shares of the parties involved. The plaintiffs and defendants were afforded rights to pursue applications for final decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found in favor of the plaintiffs based on the established ownership and legal entitlements to the property.
The court found in favor of the plaintiffs based on the established ownership and legal entitlements to the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found in favor of the plaintiffs based on the established ownership and legal entitlements to the property.
The court found in favor of the plaintiffs based on the established ownership and legal entitlements to the property.
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that the plaintiffs and defendants acknowledge co-ownership and have established respective legal rights to their claims over the property.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: a) Plaint schedule property is found to be partible. b) Plaintiffs 1 and 2 are declared to be entitled to 1/12th share each and defendants 1 and 2 are entitled to 1/6th share over the plaint schedule property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Reshma Ravi
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- W/o Syam Prasad P.B, D/o late K.K.Ravi
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Raiga Ravi
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- W/o Vinu Gopalakrishnan, D/o late K.K.Ravi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manoharan K.K
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o late Kumaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thankappan K.K
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o late Kumaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shine K.K alias Shinekumar
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o late Kumaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Girija
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o late Shine K.K
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vishak
- Party Age
- 18
- Relation
- S/o late Shine K.K
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale deed no. 797/94 of SRO Edapally.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Fazil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.S.Sreejith
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jayasree Manoj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Saju Thaliyath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jithin Paul Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ann Mary Francis
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C.R.Suraj Babu
- Appearance Type
- Exparte
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.Rahul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ashwin Antony
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs are declared to be entitled to 1/12th share each over the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. a) Plaint schedule property is found to be partible. b) Plaintiffs 1 and 2 are declared to be entitled to 1/12th share each...
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendants 1 and 2 are entitled to 1/6th share over the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
b) Plaintiffs 1 and 2 are declared to be entitled to 1/12th share each and defendants 1 and 2 are entitled to 1/6th share...
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendants 4 and 5 are declared to be entitled to 1/4th share each.
Evidence:
b) Defendants No. 4 and 5 are declared to be entitled to 1/4th share each.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs and defendants No. 4 and 5 are permitted to file application for passing of a final decree.
Evidence:
c) The plaintiffs and defendants No.4 and 5 are permitted to file application for passing of a final decree along the aforesaid lines.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the purchase of the plaint schedule property by the co-owners, which is central to the dispute.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Reshma Ravi, Raiga Ravi vs Manoharan K.K, Thankappan K.K, Shine K.K alias Shinekumar, Girija, Vishak regarding partition.
Case Code Year
Case between Reshma Ravi, Raiga Ravi vs Manoharan K.K, Thankappan K.K, Shine K.K alias Shinekumar, Girija, Vishak regarding partition.