Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1139/2018

Case between Rema M P vs P P Ramachandran et al regarding Restoration Petition.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M
Order Date
2025-08-26
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 08/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Rema M P as the petitioner and P P Ramachandran along with the Jewel Arcade Owners Association and Abraham as the respondents. Rema M P filed a petition to restore a suit that had been dismissed for default due to her absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for default due to the absence of the petitioner. The petitioner did not appear in court on the scheduled date for the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for default due to the absence of the petitioner. The petitioner did not appear in court on the scheduled date for the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to appear and represent herself.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner failed to appear and represent herself.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner absent. Not represented. The petition was posted to this date specifically for the petitioner to appear and submit whether he is intending to proceed with the petition. Still the petitioner is absent and not represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rema M P
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o. Late S. Laxminarayanan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P P Ramachandran
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o. U K Chettiar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jewel Arcade Owners Association
Relation
represented by its Secretary, Mr. Atraham
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abraham
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswin Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Philip T Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thomas T Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shubha Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rema M P vs P P Ramachandran et al regarding Restoration Petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Rema M P vs P P Ramachandran et al regarding Restoration Petition.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 08/26/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Latha Murali vs Subaida P et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank Of India vs M/s Network Academy regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vasudevan Pillai vs Muhammed Haneeffa C et al regarding restoration of a dismissed petition.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Johny Thomas vs Shiju alias Thampi regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Elsy James vs P.C Jose regarding restoration of original suit.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won