Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 107.2025

Case between Reenu Singh vs Varghese Rajan et al regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-12-20
Duration
approximately-1 year 8 months
Case Closed
Sat, 12/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Reenu Singh filed a suit against Varghese Rajan and Alex Rajan for recovery of ₹9,96,500/- with interest. The defendants failed to appear in court, resulting in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing her to recover ₹9,96,500/- with interest at 6% per annum from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Recovery of ₹9,96,500/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing her to recover ₹9,96,500/- with interest at 6% per annum from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved her claim with documentary evidence and the absence of rebuttal evidence from the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved her claim with documentary evidence and the absence of rebuttal evidence from the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence shows that despite receipt of substantial amount from the plaintiff and despite the plaintiff’s readiness and willingness to perform her part of contract, the defendants avoided execution of the sale deed and demanded additional consideration.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed ex parte as follows: 1. The plaintiff is entitled to realise a sum of 9,96,500/- from the defendants jointly and severally, with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till realisation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Reenu Singh
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Varghese Rajan
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Alex Rajan
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Property Sale Contract Agreements, Receipts for transfers to Union Bank, Legal notices.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shaji George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Susan George
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff seeks to recover a sum of ₹9,96,500 from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed ex parte as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realise a sum of 9,96,500/- (Rupees Nine Lakhs Ninety Six Thousand Five Hundred only) from the defendants jointly and severally, with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till realisation.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff seeks to recover costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
2. The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Property Sale Contract Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidence supporting the agreement between the plaintiff and the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Property Sale Contract Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidence supporting the agreement between the plaintiff and the 2nd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Communication from the 2nd defendant to the plaintiff relating to the transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document providing evidence of payment transferred to the bank on behalf of the 2nd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document providing evidence of additional payment transferred to the bank on behalf of the 2nd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of a complaint submitted at the police station by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of legal communication sent to the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of postal communication related to the lawsuit.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirmation of receipt of documents in relation to the legal proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Breach of Contract
Case Code
Case between Reenu Singh vs Varghese Rajan et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Reenu Singh vs Varghese Rajan et al regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Wed, 11/05/2025 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 12/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd vs Sam Lukose et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Sinimol M.M., Dileep E.J., Shajimon E.B., Aradhana P.S. regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Sundaran V.S. et al regarding realization of money.
The Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Biju A N et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Pukadiyil Traders et al vs Bimlesh Kumar Sigh regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won