Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 911/2025

Case between Rancy Augustine vs R.J Antony regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rancy Augustine has filed a suit against R.J Antony for the recovery of a borrowed sum which includes principal and interest. The defendant failed to appear or defend the case, leading to a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of Rancy Augustine, ordering R.J Antony to pay the total amount due along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay ₹9,48,430/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of Rancy Augustine, ordering R.J Antony to pay the total amount due along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's case was proven through uncontested evidence as the defendant failed to appear.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's case was proven through uncontested evidence as the defendant failed to appear.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of ₹9,48,430/- (Rupees nine lakh forty eight thousand four hundred and thirty only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rancy Augustine
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
R.J Antony
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Promissory Note documents A1 to A4, Office copy of Legal Notice, Postal Receipt, Postal Acknowledgment Card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Baby Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Baby Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹9,48,430/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of ₹9,48,430/- (Rupees nine lakh forty eight thousand four hundred and thirty only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents were used as evidence to support the plaintiff's claim of money lent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1 to A4
Document Type: Office copy of legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to indicate that a legal notice was served regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to verify the sending of the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirmed the receipt of the legal notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff's oral testimony was taken into account in the absence of the defendant.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Rancy Augustine vs R.J Antony regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Rancy Augustine vs R.J Antony regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Antony Chiriyankandath vs Sri. Mathew C.T. regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera N B vs Vincy E J et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s Crystal Traders regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won