Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 190 OF 2017

Case between Ramlath et al vs Khaja Muheeyudheen et al regarding Injunction

Court
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K., B.Sc., LL.B.
Order Date
2018-12-19
Duration
1 year 11 months 28 days
Case Closed
Wed, 12/19/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The suit for injunction was filed by Ramlath and others against Khaja Muheeyudheen and others. The court dismissed the suit for default due to non-appearance of one defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of one of the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not granted due to dismissal
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of one of the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit for Injunction. Plaintiff represented. D1 represented. Paper publication against D2 not seen produced yet. Hence suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ramlath
Party Age
50
Relation
Not mentioned
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ayisa Beegam
Party Age
39
Relation
Not mentioned
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rasheeda
Party Age
30
Relation
Not mentioned
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Khaja Muheeyudheen
Party Age
36
Relation
Not mentioned
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Mukthar
Party Age
47
Relation
Not mentioned
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Azeez
Party Age
43
Relation
Not mentioned
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mullasseriyakath Panatt Tharayil Hamza Haji's Wife and D/o Karattu Kadavath Kunharamu; Fathima
Party Age
67
Relation
Wife and D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.Ajaykumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Deepa Gopinath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Dinesh Pookkayil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Sreeraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Seeking relief through injunction
Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Injunction
Case Code
Case between Ramlath et al vs Khaja Muheeyudheen et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ramlath et al vs Khaja Muheeyudheen et al regarding Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 12/19/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 12/19/2018 - 12:00
From
Sat, 12/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Mon, 12/31/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Pathummu Umma et al vs Chenganasseri Sainaba et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Moideenkutty vs Alavi et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Hamza et al vs Balakrishnan et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Mundekkatt Muhammed Haji vs Kadavath Muhammed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Adayattil Hamza et al vs Pattath Kunhimoideen et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won