Case Summary
Plaintiffs comprising Hamza, Fathima, Nafeesa represented by power of attorney holder Kanakkayil Abdul Razak, filed a suit against defendants Balakrishnan, Velayudhan, Janaki, Narayani, and Dhakshayani seeking injunction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of suit
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed as per the terms of a lawful compromise agreement.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for injunction. IA. 1008/2016 allowed. Since the terms of compromise is lawful, the suit is dismissed as per the terms of compromise. Compromise shall form part of decree. Suit is dismissed as no costs. (Pronounced by me in open court, this, the 7ᵗʰ day of April, 2017) sd/- MUNSIFF.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Hamza
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- Represented by Power of Attorney holder
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fathima
- Party Age
- 49
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nafeesa
- Party Age
- 37
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Balakrishnan
- Party Age
- 60
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Velayudhan
- Party Age
- 45
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Janaki
- Party Age
- 57
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Narayani
- Party Age
- 55
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dhakshayani
- Party Age
- 52
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.A. Padmakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Suresh. A. Alingal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Dismissal of suit
Description:
To prevent obstruction or disturbance by defendants
Evidence:
Suit for injunction. IA. 1008/2016 allowed. Since the terms of compromise is lawful, the suit is dismissed as per the terms of compromise. Compromise shall form part of decree. Suit is dismissed as no costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Injunction
Case Code
Case between Hamza et al vs Balakrishnan et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Hamza et al vs Balakrishnan et al regarding injunction