Case Summary
Plaintiffs sought injunction against defendants. Due to plaintiffs' absence, the suit was dismissed for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default with costs due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pathummu Umma
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- Daughter of Moideen
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Subaida
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- Daughter of Pathummu Umma
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chenganasseri Sainaba
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- Daughter of Kuzhikkattil Moosa
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shamsul Hak
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- Daughter of Kuzhikkattil Moosa
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiffs sought injunction against defendants.
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Injunction
Case Code
Case between Pathummu Umma et al vs Chenganasseri Sainaba et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Pathummu Umma et al vs Chenganasseri Sainaba et al regarding injunction