Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 14 OF 20 16

Case between Ramla vs Divakaran et al regarding injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2018-03-08
Duration
2 years 11 months 14 days
Case Closed
Thu, 03/08/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ramla, the plaintiff, sought injunction against Divakaran and others to prevent reducing the width of the way or obstructing the use of a specific pathway.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted permanent inhibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent obstruction and reduce the width of the pathway.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted permanent inhibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent obstruction and reduce the width of the pathway.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Compromise IA. 782/2018 is filed. Since the terms of compromise is lawful is decreed as follows. The defendant is hereby restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from reducing the width of the way or from making any obstruction to the plaintiff in the use of Plaint "B" schedule way.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ramla
Party Age
32
Relation
W/o. Karatt Kadavath Pattayil Muhammed Shafi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Divakaran
Party Age
60
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Karatt Kadavath Pattayil Muhammed Shafi
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o. Ahammed kutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinod
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o. Narayanankutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise IA. 782/2018
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant restrained from reducing the width of pathway or obstructing plaintiff's use of schedule way.
Evidence:
Compromise IA. 782/2018 is filed. Since the terms of compromise is lawful is decreed as follows. The defendant is hereby restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from reducing the width of the way or from making any obstruction to the plaintiff in the use of Plaint "B" schedule way.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Injunction
Case Code
Case between Ramla vs Divakaran et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ramla vs Divakaran et al regarding injunction

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Tue, 03/08/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 03/08/2018 - 12:00
From
Thu, 03/01/2018 - 12:00
To
Sat, 03/31/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Pathummu Umma et al vs Chenganasseri Sainaba et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Moideenkutty vs Alavi et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Hamza et al vs Balakrishnan et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Mundekkatt Muhammed Haji vs Kadavath Muhammed regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Adayattil Hamza et al vs Pattath Kunhimoideen et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won