Case Summary
Rakesh Kandath is the owner of an apartment who filed a petition for eviction against his tenant, P. Anandkumar, due to non-payment of rent. The petition was allowed, directing the tenant to vacate the property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the tenant from the premises.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established his claim with uncontroverted evidence.
The petitioner established his claim with uncontroverted evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs as follows: The respondent/tenant is directed to put the landlord/petitioner in possession of the petition schedule building under Section 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act within 30 days from today.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Rakesh Kandath (39 years)
House No. 17/369, Kalleppully P.O., Marutha Road Village, Palakkad 678005
Defendants
P. Anandkumar (59 years)
No.CF Door. No.8/389J3, First Floor, Rambal Madhavam Apartment, Thripunithura, Ernakulam682301
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petitioner sought eviction of the respondent from the leased premises.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed u/s 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Lease Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original lease agreement dated 05.11.2022 establishing the rental arrangement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer's notice sent to the respondent which was returned unserved.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
Oral testimony of the petitioner establishing the case.
Reference: