Case Summary
Rajesh is the complainant who filed a complaint against Raghavan for an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint has been dismissed due to the complainant's continuous absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the complaint due to the complainant's non-appearance and lack of prosecution.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant did not diligently prosecute the case.
The complainant did not diligently prosecute the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that this complainant is not diligently prosecuting the complaint.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the complaint is dismissed u/s 256 Cr.PC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajesh
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raghavan
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P V Suresh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Lali Abraham
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Pala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajesh vs Raghavan regarding offence under N.I. Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Rajesh vs Raghavan regarding offence under N.I. Act.
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act