Case Summary
The case involves a petition filed by Gireesh Babu O G to set aside an exparte decree. The respondent, Rajesh, opposed the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for delay.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
IA 01/24 dismissed (vide separate Order). Dismissed for delay.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajesh
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gireesh Babu O G
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- S. Russel
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anto Thomas Palatty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vismya Venugopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C. M Nazar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shaji Thankappan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Petition to set aside the exparte decree passed in the case.
Evidence:
IA 01/24 dismissed (vide separate Order). Dismissed for delay.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajesh vs Gireesh Babu O G regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
Case Code Year
Case between Rajesh vs Gireesh Babu O G regarding setting aside an exparte decree.