Case Summary
The petitioners are Rajendran Pillai and Prasanna Kumary, while the respondents are Vanaja and Padmini Amma. This recovery petition was filed under Order 9 Rule 9 of the CPC.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Costs paid, IA allowed
Case Type
Recovery Petition
Final Judgment
No
The recovery petition was allowed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was filed under the relevant rule and processed accordingly.
The petition was filed under the relevant rule and processed accordingly.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petition was filed under the relevant rule and processed accordingly.
The petition was filed under the relevant rule and processed accordingly.
Supporting Evidence
The petition was filed and processed according to the order of the court.
Judgment Evidence:
Both sides represented. Costs paid, IA allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajendran Pillai
- Party Age
- 65
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prasanna Kumary
- Party Age
- 53
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vanaja
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Padmini Amma
- Party Age
- 72
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Soja Thulaseedharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Recovery Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajendran Pillai et al vs Vanaja et al regarding recovery petition
Case Code Year
Case between Rajendran Pillai et al vs Vanaja et al regarding recovery petition