Case Summary
Rafeeq, the petitioner, filed an application seeking to depute an Advocate Commissioner to divide the property as per the partition decree passed in the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Final decree for partition
Case Type
Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition after the parties compromised on the division of property as per a specific valuation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Terms of the compromise were lawful.
Judgment Evidence:
Final decree is passed as stated.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rafeeq
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o Mammukkutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Various parties (Fathimakkutty Umma et al)
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Gopi Kadavath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Vidya.K.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Noorjahan.V.C.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Mrithula.N.K.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Final decree for partition according to the compromise agreement.
Evidence:
Final decree is passed as stated.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Partition Suit
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rafeeq vs Fathimakkutty Umma et al regarding partition of property
Case Code Year
Case between Rafeeq vs Fathimakkutty Umma et al regarding partition of property
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement